NY Post exposes celebrity facialist as a Scientologist — here's more to consider
The New York Post on Thursday published a great investigative expose of Joanna Vargas, a famous facialist to the stars.
Writer Kyra Breslin obviously did a ton of work talking to dozens of former Vargas employees about the horrendous working conditions there, and how Scientology was a constant element of it. (Scientology’s own publications indicate that Joanna Vargas is an OT 8, and her husband Cesar at least OT 6.)
As thorough as the piece was, however, we were surprised that such a detailed article didn’t include an interview with a Scientology expert to explain what those employees were talking about.
So we turned to one of those experts, former top Sea Org official Claire Headley, to give us her thoughts about what the Vargas employees were describing.
I did not know Joanna or Cesar Vargas during my time in Scientology. That said, based on what is described in the article, this reads very clearly as a workplace being run using core Scientology management and control systems.
What stood out immediately is that this is not incidental influence, it is structured, applied Scientology just like what you’d expect to see in a Scientology organization delivering Scientology services.
A few examples:
— The use of “conditions” like Affluence and Danger is directly from Scientology’s Ethics Conditions formulas. These are not casual labels as you know, they are part of a formal system used to rank individuals based on perceived production and enforce behavioral compliance. Employees assigned a lower condition are required to write up what they did wrong (overts and withholds), accept responsibility, and take corrective actions.
— References to “ethics gradients” reflect another internal Scientology concept. These are structured steps used to increase pressure on an individual incrementally until they conform ((Gradients of Ethics and Justice Actions in the Ethics book). For example, actions like “talking about somebody derogatorily” and “talking to the person derogatorily” are placed at different points on a graded scale (these are 5 and 6 on a scale of 1 to 36). That’s why it’s not only common but encouraged to mistreat staff with verbally abusive language and worse. The purpose is not just classification, but escalation by applying increasing scrutiny and consequences in a controlled way until compliance is achieved.
— Weekly staff meetings are another dead giveaway. In Scientology organizations, these meetings are mandatory and highly structured. They typically include sections for “Flaps and Handlings” (problems and how they were addressed), “General Business,” and the assignment of ethics conditions by area based on weekly statistics. This kind of meeting format is not standard business practice, it is specific to Scientology administrative technology.
— Mandatory study and written reflections mirror Scientology “study tech” and training routines. The inclusion of materials like The Model of Admin Know-How policy and required write-ups is consistent with how Scientology organizations train and indoctrinate staff.
— The use of terminology like “theta,” “handling,” and structured weekly meetings aligns with Scientology administrative practices, where language itself reinforces group ideology and control.
— The inclusion of Scientologist Grant Cardone as required viewing fits a broader pattern we have seen where Scientology-affiliated business operators use his content as a proxy for motivational training layered with high-pressure sales culture.
This is what I would classify as a “Scientology-style org board environment,” meaning the business is not just influenced by Scientology, but is being run using its internal management technology.
In those environments, the following are common:
Performance is tied to constant measurement and public evaluation
Personal worth becomes linked to production statistics
Criticism and correction are formalized and normalized
Employees are pressured to adopt the belief system as a “requirement” for professional “success”
Dissent is reframed as personal failure rather than a legitimate concern
The reports in the article describing fear-based management, excessive pressure, forced participation in training and emotional breakdowns are consistent with what happens when those systems are used.
If the Post had reached out, that is the key context I would have provided: This is not just a “toxic workplace,” it appears to be a workplace structured around a specific Scientological management system designed to control behavior, increase output, and minimize dissent.
That distinction matters, because without it, the dynamics can look arbitrary or personality-driven, when in fact they are highly systematized.
— Claire Headley
Eight days to go: The ‘Brothers Broken’ general release!
On April 28, Geoff Levin’s documentary about reuniting with his brother Robbie after Scientology tore them apart is being released to the general public on April 28, and you can order your copy right now!
Full disclosure: Your proprietor is in the movie, because Geoff gives us credit for helping him pull himself back from the brink as he was leaving Scientology and nearly lost his life because of it. He became a major part of the Underground Bunker community as he righted his life and finally made a new connection with his brother.
The HowdyCon agenda!
The first wave of tickets have now officially sold out, but don’t worry, more will be released soon. In the meantime, we are excited to announce the agenda for this year’s event. The full list of talks is on view at the convention website!
HowdyCon will be taking place at multiple venues throughout New London, CT and in order to minimize potential interference from Scientology, the details will be shared exclusively with those who have purchased a ticket.
Want to help?
Please consider joining the Underground Bunker as a paid subscriber. Your $7 a month will go a long way to helping this news project stay independent, and you’ll get access to our special podcast series…
Group Therapy: Our round table of rowdy regulars discussing the week’s news, which drops each Sunday at noon.
Also, you can support the Underground Bunker with a Paypal contribution to bunkerfund@tonyortega.org, an account administered by the Bunker’s attorney, Scott Pilutik. And by request, this is our Venmo link, and for Zelle, please use (tonyo94 AT gmail). E-mail tips to tonyo94@gmail.com. Find us at Threads: tony.ortega.1044 and Bluesky: @tonyortega.bsky.social
For the full picture of what’s happening today in the world of Scientology, please join the conversation at tonyortega.org, where we’ve been reporting daily on David Miscavige’s cabal since 2012. There you’ll find additional stories, and our popular regular daily features:
Source Code: Actual things founder L. Ron Hubbard said on this date in history
Avast, Ye Mateys: Snapshots from Scientology’s years at sea
Overheard in the Freezone: Indie Hubbardism, one thought at a time
Past is Prologue: From this week in history at alt.religion.scientology
Random Howdy: Your daily dose of the Captain
Here’s the link for today’s post at tonyortega.org
And whatever you do, subscribe to this Substack so you get our breaking stories and daily features right to your email inbox every morning.





In my documentary Brothers Broken there are glimpses of how I was turning into a person like the Vargas’s. I can relate to trying to handle staff “per policy”. I was torn between being a nasty, mean, domineering boss and treating employees with respect and care. Ultimately as you will see in the film it almost killed me.
Good article, excellent negative publicity for the cult. Chloe Fineman photo is not surprising. As far as I know she is still in Scientology. Interesting to see how the Vargas’s take on the Sea Org executive persona’s. If I was to define the full end product of Hubbards organization and philosophy’s it would be: “half human half robot short circuited narcissistic materialists.” That for me is a full on dedicated member. There are many Scientologists who are somewhere in between. At some point they have to make a choice, leave or get assimilated into the hive.