[Today's guest post is by Bruce Hines]
What was it like to be a Flag auditor? I imagine that most people would have no interest in finding out. But I figured I’d write something so there can be some record of it, possibly for future historians (tip of the hat to Chuck Beatty). It is an account of one aspect of the inner workings of the Church of Scientology. While there are many people who shared a similar experience to mine, I have seen very little written about such things. Here is my depiction of the day-to-day life of a person who became an auditor in a unique organization within the Scientology network.
So, firstly, for those who know little or nothing about the subject, what is a Flag auditor? An auditor is someone who practices Scientology’s one-on-one “processing” on another person. A PR term for auditing is “spiritual counseling.” I think this is a misnomer. In a session, an auditor is not counseling the person being audited. Counseling implies advice or suggestions or recommendations. An auditor asks specific prescribed questions or gives specific prescribed commands, and is not allowed to comment on the answers or results.
The name Flag refers to the Flag Service Organization, which is located on the Flag Land Base in Clearwater, Florida. The flagship of the flotilla of Scientology’s Sea Organization, the Apollo, stopped sailing around in 1975, and the personnel and units that had been on that ship set up shop in Clearwater. So, they kept the name, Flag.
In the promotional materials of Scientology, Flag was supposed to have the best auditors in the world. The catchphrase was, “The mecca for those who seek technical perfection.” This started on the Apollo, where the technical personnel were trained under the watchful eye of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard himself. This line of advertising continued when they moved to land, even though Hubbard was no longer present at the base. The idea was to be able to charge more for the auditing at Flag and to attract customers from all over the world.
For the uninitiated, I will clarify that Hubbard called the practices and procedures of Scientology — especially in auditing and training — as a technology. He wrote “technical” bulletins. It seems he was trying to make the subject appear scientific. It wasn’t.
It started in the latter part of 1980. I had been at Flag as a staff member of the Advanced Organization Los Angeles in order to get trained as an auditor. As I was nearing the end of that training, some people much higher on the org chart than I decided to make a swap. Some people who had been Flag staff were sent to AOLA, and in exchange, I would become Flag staff. It was sort of like sports teams making a trade. And, just like that, I was a Flag auditor.
Now, I admit that there was a certain amount of pride or ego in having that designation. The auditors at Flag, supposedly the best technical service organization in the world, were generally held in high regard. I had that position until 1987, which is when I got transferred to the International headquarters near Hemet, California. When I got there, my new boss was a man named Jeff Walker. He had been the Senior Case Supervisor FSO when I was there and had moved up to Senior Case Supervisor International. Not long after I had been at Int I said something to Jeff about Flag auditors being good. He replied, “You don’t believe their PR, do you?” I came to learn that the top technical people at Int did not have much regard for the technical delivery at Flag. So much for the cool status I thought I’d had.
In any event, back in 1980, I went to work in a “Hubbard Guidance Center” (HGC) at Flag, which is where paying public received their auditing. Those people were called “pc’s” (preclears, trying to attain the State of Clear) or “pre-OT’s” (those already Clear and on their way to becoming “operating thetans”). Most Scientology service organizations in the world have one HGC. Flag was so big that it had, as I recall, seven HGCs when I was there. Each HGC was headed by its own “Director of Processing.”
Each one also had its own Case Supervisors (C/Ses), who were technically senior to the auditors. There were also “technical services” personnel, who made sure that the auditors and C/Ses were supplied with paper, forms, manila folders, pens of various colors, paper clips, staplers, rubber bands, hand cream, antiperspirant, and other things needed for auditing.
Each HGC also had one other person, key to the whole operation, who held the post of “Board In-charge.” This position stood before an actual board and “ran” it. The board was about six feet by eight feet and stood on some kind of big easel or legs. Magnets stuck to it. There were many magnetic, color-coded, rectangular tags arranged on the surface. Names or words were written on the tags in some kind of erasable ink. In a column on the left were all of the auditors, usually five to eight of them, working at that time in that HGC. In a row to the right of each auditor there were tags for all of the people being audited, referred to as that auditor’s “lineup.” Smaller descriptive tags of different colors would then be placed next to the tags of the auditors and people being audited — things like “In Cramming” or “At lunch” or “In session” or “getting sessionable” (i.e. taking a nap or eating something), or “At the Registrar.”
The Board In-charge stood at the board and was kind of like a quarterback (for those familiar with American football). They answered the phone. They greeted people who entered the HGC and found out what they were there for. They sent runners to fetch pc’s or pre-OT’s for session. They had to answer questions from executives, who came to check on the HGC’s “production” (i.e. statistics). They had to appropriately deal with the paying public persons, who might be upset or happy. They had to control the auditors, who were, in a way, the stars of the show and could be a bit like primadonas.
The idea was to maximize the statistic of “Well Done Auditing Hours” (WDAHs), one of the key gauges for any service organization. That meant that there should be nothing that delayed the auditors from getting into session. So, the Board In-charge was supposed to make sure the pc’s and pre-OT’s were well-rested and well-fed; to try to keep the auditors from chatting with one another rather than writing up their session reports; to get the auditing folders coming out from the case supervisors’ office to the auditors right away; to make sure that the next pc or pre-OT on an auditor’s line-up was ready and waiting when the auditor came out of the “admin” room to go into session; to keep the paying public from having to wait for unnecessarily long periods of time; to “route” (with a “routing form”) people being audited to other places in the organization when needed (like to a Registrar to buy more auditing), and to take care of many other details. An experienced and capable Board In-charge was very valuable to the organization. They had to be able to juggle all of these things. Plus, money paid for auditing was usually the largest stream of income for a service org.
As an auditor in this operation, my aim was to audit as many well-done hours per week as possible. “WDAHs” was my individual statistic. I had to audit a certain number of hours per week in order to be in the ethics condition of “Normal Operation” or better. Above Normal were the conditions of “Affluence” and “Power.” One had to be in Normal or above for the week in order to be eligible for a rare day off or for “org awards” (like pizza and a movie in the auditorium on Saturday night).
The game was to minimize the time between sessions, as this time did not count on the stat. At the end of a session, the auditor packs the session worksheets and confidential materials into a locked briefcase, takes the pc or pre-OT to the “Examiner” (who checks to see if there is a floating needle on an E-meter), goes to the HGC, drops the folder for that pc or pre-OT, puts the folder for the next pc or pre-OT into the briefcase, goes out to the waiting area to greet the next pc or pre-OT, walks with them to the auditing room, gets them settled in a chair, goes through pre-session actions (which might include removing shoes, applying hand cream, switching to a different size of cans, adjusting the sensitivity of the E-meter, testing the basal metabolism of the pc or pre-OT, adjusting the room temperature, making sure they are comfortable, asking if there is any reason not to begin the session), and then finally starting the session. Only the time between the auditor saying “This is the session” and “End of session” is supposed to count.
The best way to minimize the time that didn’t count was to give long sessions. In the early days, Hubbard said that 2.5 hours was a good length for a session. A preclear could get a session per day at that length, Monday through Friday, and then have used 12.5 hours of the auditing they had paid for. This was why auditing was sold in 12.5 hour blocks, which was one “intensive.” Mr. Hubbard said that auditing is most successful when it is delivered intensively. That practice of selling auditing by the intensive continued into later years, even after organizational scheduling changed.
Originally, the idea was that an org would operate five days a week, eight hours a day, much like many businesses in the 1950s.
By the time I started auditing at Flag, things were drastically different. We were supposed to audit seven days a week (or six when we got a rare day off), from 9:00 in the morning to 10:00 in the evening, with short meal breaks. And after 10pm, I would usually be writing up the session reports. Those reports then went into the folder for that pc or pre-OT, to be delivered to the case supervisor, who would evaluate the session.
At some point in the 1960s, I think it was, Hubbard wrote that for an auditor to be in an ethics condition of Normal Operation, they had to audit at least 25 hours in that week. In the original org schedule, that would mean two 2.5-hour sessions per day for five days. Boy, that sounds so easy to me in comparison. Later, in the 70s, a “Flag Order” was issued that said Sea Org auditors had to produce 35 WDAHs per week to be in Normal. With the lengthened schedule, that would not have been difficult except for one fact. In the kind of auditing that I was mainly doing (called “NOTs,” for New Era Dianetics for OTs), the sessions were supposed to be short. The length might be ten or 20 or 30 minutes. The theory was that continuing the session beyond the ideal ending point would harm the pre-OTs case. If I had four or five pre-OTs on my lineup, which was common, I would usually give something like ten or even 15 sessions per day. That meant that there were a lot of trips back and forth between my auditing room and the HGC. I had to average five WDAHs a day in order to be in Normal. Then I could enjoy the benefits of being in that ethics condition or higher, and avoid the unpleasantness of being in a condition below that. Of course, the number of pre-OTs on my lineup and the lengths of sessions varied. But it was generally challenging.
Ideally, the HGC was supposed to run like a Swiss watch. The auditors would take their people into session, one after another, in what was called the “leapfrog system.” An auditor was supposed to work through their lineup and then start over with the first pc or pre-OT, over and over. The Board In-charge was supposed to have an auditor’s next person in the waiting area, a room adjacent to the HGC, so they could get into session as soon as possible. There was a constant coming and going of auditors and their pc’s or pre-OTs in a tightly controlled dance.
One thing did not help. When walking with the pre-OT or pc to the auditing room, usually we would start chatting. I generally like people and enjoy talking to them. These conversations often continued after we went into the auditing room. That increased the length of time before starting the session, thereby lowering my WDAHs. A Flag auditor was supposed to be all business and efficient. That wasn’t my strong suit. So, I often had a sense of guilt about wasting time and withheld that fact. I still was generally able to make my 35 hours, though I was not one of the consistently “high producing” auditors.
From time to time it came up that some auditor or another would count the session setup time, in order to boost their stats. When that got found out, the offending auditor would get in big trouble. The pc or pre-OT would then be paying extra for their auditing, maybe 20 or 30 or more minutes per day. At something like $400 - $600 per hour of auditing (depending on the year), that is not an insignificant amount. Even so, when an auditor got caught cheating in this way, the cheated money would not be recredited to the pc’s or pre-OT’s account.
Another big hurdle to making WDAH’s was cramming. All auditors at Flag, and at any Scientology organization, would sometimes get sent to cramming. This happens when the case supervisor reads through the session reports and adjudicates that the auditor made an error. Then the C/S writes a cramming order. The offending auditor would then have to go to the Cramming Section, get interviewed to nail down that auditor’s weaknesses, and then complete a program of re-studying materials, finding misunderstood words (“word clearing”), demonstrations, and drills. Then the auditor would attest to the completion of the cram, complete with a “success story,” and could then return to the HGC to resume auditing. A short cram might take an hour, a big cram about three hours, and rarely, if the errors were deemed to be serious, the correction could take all day.
One aspect of the cramming is that sometimes pc’s or pre-OT’s could get upset due to having to wait longer for their next session. Most of these people had flown in from afar, having taken time off work, to try to complete an auditing action, or a series of them. These actions marked their progress up the “Bridge to Total Freedom.” It could be quite problematic for them if they had to extend their stay — which would entail canceling flight reservations, paying more for food and accommodations (they were required to stay in costly Flag hotels), and deal with potential fallout back home. You see, they were not allowed to leave Flag until they were given the OK by higher-ups in the organization. Usually that OK would not be given if the pc or pre-OT were in the middle of an auditing action. The Board In-charge or the Director of Processing would try to calm such upset people down, and the auditor would sometimes have to deal with the upset in session.
When I got sent to Cramming, I would get “handled” by some, in retrospect, notable people. The first of these was a guy named Ron Norton. He later got promoted to Chief Officer of the FSO, and then to Captain FSO — Debbie Cook took over that post from him after he was sent to Golden Era Productions on the Int Base to hold an executive post there. After Ron, my usual Cramming Officer was Jesse Prince. He was an entertaining character with a great sense of humor. He was able to excel as one of very few African Americans in a lily-white cult (at least in those days), even getting promoted from Flag to the Religious Technology Center (the highest entity in all of Scientology) at the Int Base. Dennis Erlich also had to cram me from time to time, as did Spike Bush.
Spike was another intriguing guy, who at one time was the lead singer in a band that included future members of Blue Oyster Cult. He also ended up in RTC, though, the last I knew, he had been a groundskeeper at the Int Base for many years. Being an auditor came with some perks, as the activity of auditing was so lucrative to the organization. We got out of most musters and “all-hands” activites (like stuffing envelopes or making phone calls to prospective customers). Nonetheless, the job was stressful, at least for me. There was the constant pressure to produce WDAHs. It was sometimes a juggling act to try to keep all the people on my lineup happy — there could be six or more of them and often they wouldn’t like it if they only got a couple of short sessions in a day. There were also times when business was slow and with only two people on my lineup, by mid-afternoon they might have had as many sessions as they could easily tolerate for one day. Plus, while many pc’s and pre-OTs were easy to audit, some could be difficult and be in a sour mood much of the time — then I’d likely have to spend quite a bit of time in Cramming. In that world, if a session does not go well, it is always the auditor’s fault.
It all got significantly more stressful in about 1983. There was a shakeup at Flag, with the Captain, a guy named Carl Carlson, getting sent to the RPF (the Rehabilitation Project Force, the Sea Org’s prison program), if I am remembering things correctly. Also the Chief Officer, who is an executive under the Captain, was removed from post. A guy named Brian Patrick became the new Captain, which is when Ron Norton became the Chief Officer. The whole atmosphere of the org became more draconian in short order. These guys ran the org with threats and force. There was a lot of yelling and late nights. One of the changes was the requirement of making 42 WDAHs in order for an auditor to be in an ethics condition of Normal.
One day the auditing hours stat for the my HGC was running down for the week. The Director of Processing at the time was a lady named Nancy Knighten. She was a smallish woman from New York. Ron Norton was a large, athletic guy. During that time period he acted, in my opinion, like a stereotypical American jock. Ron was taking Nancy to task for her statistic (the sum of the WDAHs of all the auditors in her HGC).
He grabbed her by the arm, while angrily yelling, and shoved her back. She was able to keep her balance, but was visibly shaken.
Neither Ron nor Brian had always acted in this way. I had gotten to know Brian Patrick about three years earlier, when I gave him some “assist” auditing for an injury to his foot. At that time he was easy to get along with. When he got promoted to Captain the Mr. Hyde in him seemed to come out. I worked with Ron in many various capacities over the years, and I found him generally easy to get along with. But when those two guys took on these executive roles in the FSO, it signified the beginning of a new era of management. In Scientology parlance, one could say that they went into the “valence” of David Miscavige, who at that time was beginning to consolidate his power and would eventually take over Scientology. They were taking on his ruthless “beingness.”
In any event, my life as a Flag auditor went on for several more years, but with more stress and pressure. What made it more tolerable for me was that I got to know many interesting people. I don’t know how many hundreds of people I audited during those years. Many of them I have forgotten about. But some stand out in my memory.
One time on my lineup, at the same time, were two people. One had been an officer in the German army during World War II. He escaped from a group of POWs under Russian guard at the end of the war, and made it to an area where he could surrender to the Americans. After various travails, he ended up as a successful architect in Munich. The other person was a Jewish lady who had lived in a German-speaking area of Poland. Her family was murdered in a concentration camp, yet she, as a child, somehow survived. These same two people got into Scientology many years later, got up the “Grade Chart” to the level of “NOTs,” and could afford to go to Flag for auditing. Neither one knew of the other. Yet I was speaking with them both several times per day. A strange happenstance that might only occur in the odd goings-on in Scientology.
Another time I audited a person named Flo Barnett. She was the mother of Shelly Miscavige and Shelly’s sister, Clarisse, who was a staff member in Golden Era Productions. Shelly is, of course, married to David Miscavige and has been banished to a compound in the San Bernadino Mountains since 2005. Clarisse used to be married to John Brousseau. They were known as CB and JB. Both girls had been early Commodore’s Messengers. When I audited Flo, which was some time in the early 1980s, I did not know about them. I had not yet been to the Int Base. Flo mentioned that her daughters had high-up positions in Scientology, but it didn’t mean anything to me at the time. Flo herself became much better known in the Scientology world when she died a few years later under mysterious circumstances. It was ruled that she shot herself multiple times with a rifle.
Hmmm. Sounds hard to do. Tony wrote a great article about it in the Village Voice years ago.
Then, in the early 80s a person was assigned to me to audit by the name of Neil Gaiman. He was the son of two former high-ranking members of the Guardian’s Office at Saint Hill in England, known as GOWW back in the day. The WW part stands for World Wide and it was the international GO headquarters. The parents were David and Sheila Gaiman. Neil is now a well-known author. I don’t remember a lot about why I was auditing him. Was it on the “OT Drug Rundown” (which later was named New OT IV)?
That is possible. It was only for a few sessions. Since he had grown up in Scientology, he hadn’t taken recreational drugs nor many medications. On some people that Rundown can go on for some time. I do recall that he had already done the level of OT III, and so I had to use the techniques for dealing with “body thetans.” In retrospect it is interesting that he made the trip from England all the way to Florida. He was a pleasant person, somewhat reserved, and easy to get along with. The sessions were uneventful. I never heard anything further about him in the Scientology world. Since I got out of Scientology I have enjoyed some of his works.
Despite the pressures and the bizarreness of the Scientology world, I did enjoy the variety of people I audited. Some of them were or became known in their own right. These included: Jeff Pomerantz, who is the “announcer” at the beginning of all the annual international promotional events and a not-very-successful actor; Robert F. Lyons (or Bobby Lyons, as he was generally known), a somewhat more successful actor; Jeffrey Scott, the grandson of Moe Howard (of Three Stooges fame) and an Emmy winner for children’s animation; Wiebke Hansen, former Executive Director of the Hamburg org during its heyday, subject of the documentary Missing in Happy Valley, and later a set painter in Golden Era Productions (I audited her on the procedure for verifying the completion of New OT VII and she later was my “twin” on the Rehabilitation Project Force); Ron Moss, Chick Corea’s manager; Lil Linson, ex-wife of Art Linson (movie Producer) and mother of Jenny DeVocht (one of the venom-spewing wives on an installment of Anderson Cooper’s shows); Carol Masterson, the mother of Danny Masterson; and a particularly wealthy lady from Austria.
This last person was not well-known, but I remember her for some unusual behavior. When we entered the auditing room for our first session, she took off a pendant that she was wearing and proceeded to use it as a pendulum. She walked around the room while carefully watching her pendant. She was looking for force fields or energy beams or something. Evidently it would be bad if such existed in the room, as would be indicated by the pendant suddenly beginning to swing on its own. She decided that the room was OK. I probably should have had her sent to Ethics for engaging in “other practices,” but I didn’t.
I held that post for about six years. I audited hundreds of people — some for just a few sessions and some for many, many sessions over repeated trips to Flag. Some I got to know very well and they became friends. In the late 80s, a push came about for Sea Org members to not fraternize with public Scientologists. Then I was not supposed to have friends who weren’t in the Sea Org. Another Flag auditor, Rick Sheehy, got sent to the RPF because he stayed for a night with a public couple in LA when he was enroute to the Int Base.
Nonetheless, getting to know and interacting with all those people was a pleasant part of my Scientology experience. With only a few exceptions, they were good humans who meant well. They had unfortunately fallen for Hubbard’s pipe dream. None of them had special abilities or super powers. Very few even pretended to have experienced “OT phenomena.” They figured that if they just kept progressing up the Bridge they would eventually attain these higher states of being. I don’t know who among them still harbor such hopes or were able to escape Scientology’s grip. Those still in will be waiting in vain.
— Bruce Hines
Thank you for reading today’s story here at Substack. For the full picture of what’s happening today in the world of Scientology, please join the conversation at tonyortega.org, where we’ve been reporting daily on David Miscavige’s cabal since 2012. There you’ll find additional stories, and our popular regular daily features:
Source Code: Actual things founder L. Ron Hubbard said on this date in history
Avast, Ye Mateys: Snapshots from Scientology’s years at sea
Overheard in the Freezone: Indie Hubbardism, one thought at a time
Past is Prologue: From this week in history at alt.religion.scientology
Random Howdy: Your daily dose of the Captain
Here’s the link to today’s post at tonyortega.org
And whatever you do, subscribe to this Substack so you get our breaking stories and daily features right to your email inbox every morning.
Paid subscribers get access to two special podcast series every week…
Up the Bridge: A weekly journey through Scientology’s actual “technology”
Group Therapy: Our round table of rowdy regulars on the week’s news
AM ALWAYS interested in reading Bruce Hines. I trained as an auditor but couldn't cut it. Hated pink sheets and crams and ethics handling, etc. Thought it was too punitive and too many stupid rules. I think Bruce was gone by the time miscavige changed the definition of an F/N. Would be curious to know what Bruce thought about the 3 swings protocol. As a PC, I thought it was grueling.
I did training at the Flag Land Base and audited in the Flag HGC. This will not be a popular post but I have to weigh in. The trainees sent to train at Flag are (or were) generally the best auditors in their area. Whether their skills are top notch, THEY think they are and that is the first rude awakening. LIke an episode of Top Chef where every chef is the cock of the walk, these auditors come to Flag with a preconceived notion of how great they are. Then they audit some sessions.
Flag preclears are tough. Often they have been audited in another organization and are not winning. They are stuck. Their case may need some very specific handling or they just need a good auditor. They are paying a lot to be audited and are quick to complain or ask for a different auditor if they are not satisfied. (As I said, not writing this for popularity)
The C/Ses that work at Flag are the best in the world. They can spot a faulty communication cycle or bad session on paper, and could even before everything was videotaped. They can take apart your auditing, fix your bad habits and make your preclears jump for joy but you have to work with them. You have to do the required drills, relearn things you have been doing for years, etc. Not every auditor is willing to do that. Slowly the real stars/auditors of the HGC start to emerge. People who can't make it or have survived at home with false reports start to drop out. The better auditors get tougher and tougher preclears.
When I audited at Flag, I could feel a whole team pulling together. Often someone would come for auditing who believed it didn't work on them and this was their last hope. Their case was in a knot and many remedies had been tried. The admin staff, the C/S, Senior C/S and the auditor all banded together with the goal of helping this person and somehow this worked. I have seen totally impossible cases turn around in a few sessions. The directions given certainly helped but I also felt it was that certainty that the problem could be fixed. As an auditor used to working in a place where there was not much support, this was comforting and made me try harder.
There are many other aspects to the Flag Internship. It is long and grueling. I remember when I finished mine, the people in the HGC did not want to let me go back to my organization and kept assigning preclears. I finally blew up and was allowed to go back to my organization where they had one auditor and no C/S.
I did this training many years ago. When the climate of Flag became political and pc's were scrutinized more on the basis of "what would DM do if he saw that session" rather than "how can we reach this person" I lost my taste for the subject.
Jeff Walker notwithstanding, I think Flag did produce some top notch auditors. Sadly now it seems closer to a bot farm where robots would probably fare much better than actual scared outer organization trainees who have a genuine wish to help their preclear.
For those who think the is blasphemy, hey your ex may have been a tool but not all your memories are bad, right?