Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Val Ross's avatar

Miscavige’s cut comes off the top. This is what eats up the most money. It is basically impossible for any Scientology organization anywhere to be profitable when they are paying exorbitant mob fees to survive. The business model makes 0 sense.

This is when Mark Plummer would come in handy, but I’ll try to muddle through the explanation. Maybe Jeffrey Augustine knows more.

Ten percent goes straight to Scientology because they provide the “tech.” Then the International Landlord (Scientology) gets paid a monthly fee for use of the building. Then there’s the fee for the materials over and above the tech fee, which is for thin air.

Which means they have used up about half of the money that came in before they even look at things like inpatient food if they live onsite, utilities, etc. Because Scientology skims half of the money off the top for absolutely nothing, there’s no way any Scientology organization can afford to make money.

Ze Mooo's avatar

Given NarCONon's history in the US, I wonder if some local Clam had 'loaned' the SA NarCONon a lot of money and is getting repaid. On second thought, maybe a local Clam is not involved and the loaner is first in line to get paid back. Or maybe the 'administrators' are just fleecing the flock? Embezzlement is not to be discounted.

Let's say that some big time Clam 'loaned' the start up money. If that Clam is close enough to Miscavige, he could very easily require repayment quickly. Just to make the whole scam look financially sound.

Meanwhile, are the 'graduates' being recruited to do the grunt work? That never worked well at Arrowhead.

The Daily Maverick has done a great service to South Africa. Respect.

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?