Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Techie's avatar

Don't know if non-Scientologists are going to really get the bitterly harsh tone of this letter, couched as it is in a barrage of Scientologese.

Basically she is saying that her needs come first, that it was selfish to have children when it could affect the almighty mission, hit the road jack and doncha come back no more. Like the proverbial "Dear John" letter.

She uses every tool in the Scientology toolbox to cut this guy down for wanting to have an actual life.

Disconnection, abuse and the freeloader debt.

If my employer threatened to charge me for on-the-job training and job-related services I would just let him know that my lawyers would be speaking to his lawyers soon. Not so in the Scientology world. Some I have heard of were still paying this asinine "debt" years after they had completely left Scientology. It is not legal or real but Scientologists take it seriously. When I was leaving I actually asked the security guards what my debt would be. When they told me to figure it up for myself, I got wise to it.

At one point the freeloader payments to the Gold Base were more than they made for sales of products. One of the main functions of the Director of Income was to make sure the cash came in from former members.

One thing you can say about Scientologists, they really know about reactive buttons and how to push them hard. It is probably the longest part of the Communications Course, called "bull-bait", added into every one of the drills. You drill ignoring it as a student, then you drill delivering it as the coach. Back and forth through the whole course. It is almost as though Hubbard thought abuse was an important part of life...

Val Ross's avatar

For anyone who has never been in Scientology, that letter is so dense with jargon as to be almost unreadable. Reading it from the outside looking in, two paragraphs struck me as singularly appalling. They are also indicative of how a true Scientologist is brainwashed to believe.

First:

“Neither you nor Tammy checked with anybody here when you decided to have children. Both of you were contracted staff members at the time. I consider this a situation in itself as both of you now motivate on the group for not being more understanding about the scene with your kids. Have you ever considered the hardship you have added to the mission with the addition of 2 kids? You probably haven't looked at that.”

Their employer is berating him for the harm he caused to the employer by having children? Wait….what?… But seriously, anyone reading that letter can see a perfect example of how a Scientologist is always at fault when something goes wrong. Always blame someone else.

Second:

“I want to comment on one more thing that you brought up in your comm and that is regarding Tammy and her illness. You never one time that I know of used Scientology to handle her. I never knew you to give her or the kids assists, or to open an LRH book to find some answers. Tylenol and wog doctors and their evaluations became the solution. And the mission was targeted as the source of their illness. I ask you to look at what your actions and inactions did to create this scene.”

And there, boys and girls, you have it in writing. A Scientologist getting berated for not using Scientology to fix a physical illness. This should be included in Whitney Mills court case.

31 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?