Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Techie's avatar

I don't know, just because Hubbard stole an idea doesn't make it false. There are times when the only way to recover from an abusive relationship is to end it.

Where Scientology goes off the rails is to assign the label "suppressive" to anyone who doesn't like Scientology. One of these things is not like the other.

We need to ask Janice Grady if she recognizes the faces in the truly awful illustrations. They have the stink of Hubbard about them.

Val Ross's avatar

Hubbard stole some interesting material in his time. Unfortunately, he added his own spin on it. In doing so, it made it impossible to separate the good from the bad. Some of what he said had good in it, bur the fanatical application of any principle is where things go bad.

Whatever it was that Charlie saw in this booklet escapes me. All I see is over the top Hubbard blather. He makes some good points, I guess. But he had fanatical followers. And when fanatics read things someone writes, it is not necessary for the author to speak the truth. He can express an idea then expand on it in a way that has everyone reaching for their pitchforks.

Hubbard created a group of people who decided that anyone who didn’t believe exactly as they did were bad. They still think that. Rather than listening to opposing views, they close their minds. This is dangerous for themselves and others. But an easy way to create a closed society.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?