Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Techie's avatar

Nothing from Tom Cruise? But he was sort of fast-tracked up the Bridge, maybe he skipped it.

All of these testimonials make no sense at all. Almost nobody does the original Book One auditing. Maybe if you were in a Dianetics Book One interest group somewhere far from the big centers in LA or Clearwater etc. you might have done it briefly before moving on to the hard stuff. None of these well-known celebrities did that.

Seems like they assume that Book One is the basic text for all the rest, but of course that is another lie. The stupidly hypnotic abreactive therapy of Book One appears nowhere else in the weirdly complex form of the original book. Nobody is asking the File Clerk to do anything or having someone close their eyes. No snap answers. No prenatals. No cancellers. No repeater technique.

Hubbard left the original Dianetics in the dust within a few months after losing the rights. The publisher cancelled it. Where does it fit into the big picture of Scientology? Not at all, really, except it does manage to drill in the false promise that Hubbard knew all and could really "Do something about it". That's the message in the testimonials too, hope for change. No more spare change but they still have the false hope.

Chuck Beatty's avatar

Missing from Hubbard/Dianetics/Scientology's endorsement ranks, are any smart leading edge thinkers of history.

The endorsements are from superficial celebrity types.

I'd be more interested in the endorsements of the smarter types, like judges, prosecutors, highly thought of lawyers, and legislators, or politicians even who are well thought of. Better would be academics and philosophers who defend Hubbard's stuff in detail.

The smarter people's endorsements of Scientology/Dianetics was always and will always be lacking. It's just not out there to be found.

Where's the lawyers and judges who are Dianeticists and Scientologists.

Absolutely ZERO philosophers are Dianeticists and Scientologists.

---------------------------------------

Two Hubbard procedures, 1) "The PTS Rundown" and 2) Lower Condition Formula for the "Doubt" "condition" are the two times during my wasted 27 years in Hubbard's quackery world where I felt free to choose the saner smarter "real world" thinkers over Hubbard's quackery thinking. I was on the RPF at "Happy Valley" ranch, when I got the PTS Rundown, and I enjoyed choosing the outside world's thinkers, over Scientology, and that was a pivotal moment leading to me finally getting out of the Hubbard cult bureaucracy ranks, I'd been a paperpusher bureaucrat ranks staffer all my wasted decades in Sea Org.

Hubbard just isn't for smart persons.

Hubbard should have stuck with his middling pulp fiction story telling authorship and not even entered the "serious" subjects of human life.

Scientology and Dianetics, simply, are quack.

Endorsement won't be coming from the world's smart thinkers.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?