Danny Masterson's attorneys ask for concurrent sentences to lessen his time
We announced last month the reasons that we would not be in court today for Danny Masterson’s sentencing. It’s a great disappointment for us not to be there, after the days we spent in both trials bringing you as much as we could during every moment of this court drama.
As we said, we were scheduled for a hospital procedure. It went really well, the doc tells us we got all the cancer, and the recovery is going along right on schedule. However, we are still not ready to fly across the country, and so we won’t be in court this morning.
Thankfully, we still have our sources at the courthouse, and they tell us that Masterson’s legal team submitted two motions for this sentencing, not just one, and that in the first motion, they are asking that any sentences handed down by Judge Charlaine Olmedo be served concurrently rather than consecutively.
On May 31, after a second trial, Danny Masterson was convicted of two counts of forcible rape, which each bring a penalty of 15 years to life, and a combined sentence of 30 years to life in prison. But Danny’s attorneys are asking that if he receives such a sentence, both counts could be served at the same time so that he faces only 15 to life.
In the second motion, the defense is asking once again for the charges to be thrown out entirely based on the statute of limitations. Judge Olmedo has fended this off numerous times, and we don’t suspect that it will work today.
The jury could not reach a verdict on the third count, but Judge Olmedo ruled that all three victims — Jane Does 1, 2, and 3 — will get a chance to make statements in court before she passes her sentence.
So it should be a dramatic day, and like you, we are wondering what it’s going to be like in there. Judge Olmedo once again ruled out cameras, but the gallery should be packed with observers and journalists. And the family section, will it have another full showing from the Masterson clan? We suspect it will.
They will no doubt have told Danny to ignore whatever sentence Judge Olmedo throws at him, and to focus on appealing the verdict based on Olmedo’s rulings. You can see it coming a mile away: Olmedo allowed in too much of Scientology and violated Masterson’s religious rights. Olmedo allowed in too many references to drugging, which he was never charged with. And so on.
We remember thinking that Judge Olmedo’s rulings on such matters were especially detailed and heavily researched, and this is the reason why: She knew that the post-conviction appeals would focus not so much on the Jane Doe victims, but on her.
We think it was a huge shock to Danny and his family that he was convicted. But they will likely be less shocked at a long sentence. They are expecting it, and they probably believe they have a good legal strategy to fight it at the appellate level.
How that actually plays out in court, we’ll be looking forward to hear from our numerous correspondents.
Want to help?
You can support the Underground Bunker with a Paypal contribution to bunkerfund@tonyortega.org, an account administered by the Bunker’s attorney, Scott Pilutik. And by request, this is our Venmo link, and for Zelle, please use (tonyo94 AT gmail).
Thank you for reading today’s story here at Substack. For the full picture of what’s happening today in the world of Scientology, please join the conversation at tonyortega.org, where we’ve been reporting daily on David Miscavige’s cabal since 2012. There you’ll find additional stories, and our popular regular daily features:
Source Code: Actual things founder L. Ron Hubbard said on this date in history
Avast, Ye Mateys: Snapshots from Scientology’s years at sea
Overheard in the Freezone: Indie Hubbardism, one thought at a time
Past is Prologue: From this week in history at alt.religion.scientology
Random Howdy: Your daily dose of the Captain
Here’s the link for today’s post at tonyortega.org
And whatever you do, subscribe to this Substack so you get our breaking stories and daily features right to your email inbox every morning.
Paid subscribers get access to two special podcast series every week…
Up the Bridge: A weekly journey through Scientology’s actual “technology”
Group Therapy: Our round table of rowdy regulars on the week’s news
No sentence is long enough in comparison to the years of torment these women have been through.
No matter what Scientologists do, they embrace the fallacious premise that they are the elite homo-novus super beings of the universe. And their cause of clearing the planet justifies anything they do or say regarding their personal actions. The fact that the church has stood by Masterson shows what a sham the Scientology Ethics/Justice system is. I think almost every former member has had an experience where a criminal act was committed against them or involving them and it was justified by the church or the criminal church member. And at some point they all said “enough” and left.
The Danny Masterson rape case now historically establishes how Hubbards organization views the law of the land and the human rights of ex-members and non-members.
And with the Leah Remini’s defamation fair game trial we will get to see direct criminal acts committed against an ex member whose only crime was expecting scientologists to follow their own code of ethics.
For people who know little about Scientology the message is very clear. The word Scientology has become synonymous with fraud, human rights abuses and criminal members who are protected by their quasi religious organization.
I’m curious to see how the great leader David Miscavige will handle the further destruction of the cults already blackened reputation.