Episode 5: Secrets of Scientology's Hollywood Celebrity Centre
tonyortega.substack.com
Jul 23, 2022 • 56M
Episode 5: Secrets of Scientology's Hollywood Celebrity Centre
Sunny Pereira helps us understand why Scientology is standing by accused rapist Danny Masterson and so much more
Appears in this episode
Tony Ortega
Tony Ortega has been investigating and writing about the Church of Scientology since 1995, and daily since 2012 at The Underground Bunker. The Underground Bunker podcast allows him to discuss that news with important sources who know David Miscavige's cabal better than anyone.
Episode details
5 comments
Episode 5: Secrets of Scientology's Hollywood Celebrity Centre
Thank you Sunny. What you've written and exposed is beyond measure as far as helping save lives.
I have a take on why the church is backing Danny Masterson: Because way back when, when Jane Doe 1 and whoever else first approached the church with its allegations, the times were different in the church, and in society at large, and those scientology women who were in, were being handled by the church, sec checked, put into ethics conditions, etc, where everything is written down. Now, several years later, in a cultural shift in this country, etc., and a cultural shirt in the church of scientology, I doubt they treat allegations like rape the same way. If a woman goes to officials in the church with a rape allegations against another one of its members even a celebrity, it would probably distance themselves right away from all principals.
But they got in deep with Danny and there is too much in writing, too many people knew about the allegations, too many people were part of the church's weird handlings where they let Danny skate., etc. Although this church isn't beyond destroying evidence, there may be evidence and testimony they are unable to destroy.
This interview begged the question in me: If these arbitration contracts as written by the C of S, were signed in a corporation like Coca Cola for example, would these contracts hold up in a court of law. If one isn't allowed an attorney, etc., I would think this aspect alone would disallow the validity of the arbitration contract signed. Right?