On June 30, we told you that Danny Masterson was getting perhaps his last chance to disrupt his criminal rape case. His attorneys Philip Cohen and Shawn Holley were in court that day, arguing that the first of the three counts against him, the allegations of Jane Doe 1, should be dismissed.
So, the defense for defendant Danny “DJ Donkey Punch” Masterson introduces a letter which mentions several internal $cientology organisation documents?!? All of which serves to document the criminal organisation known as the “church” of $cientology interfering with a case that should have been prosecuted?
Bravo.
And well done, the judge, for keeping the frame of reference correct. This case ought to be about not only the multiple violent rapes but also about how much the organisation knew, when, and what it did about it...
"Balancing out the potential harm of the defendant against the justification for the delay, the court finds, as in Bracamontes, that the strong public interest in prosecution outweighs any potential for prejudice as I’ve already outlined.
For all of those reasons, the defense motion to dismiss Count One for pre-accusation delay is denied."
Yes, the public does have strong interest in this prosecution. And Masterson's $cieno helpers and the Clampire itself is on trial too. Now, where are those KRs and is there a way to get them for the criminal and civil trials? I wonder what Schaffer said in her KR and what other internal $cieno documents there are?
“But there is a different dynamic that goes on when you interview witnesses as it relates to the statements they give and sometimes the changing nature of those statements based upon their fear, fear of repercussion, fear of individuals, fear of organizations. And so this court doesn’t take the view that, because someone made one statement, that must necessarily be true at that time or that the statement that’s first given to the police might necessarily be true at the time. It’s this court’s experience, for having done — most of the crimes I have tried in the last ten years have been organizational crimes.”
This is outstanding! She understands and won’t be taking attacks by Masterson lightly.
Thank you for making my day! I am on holiday and a delicious coffee and this great news has tickled me. A judge that has done her research makes the October trial something to look forward to in the hopes she puts them back in their box 🤣👏🏻👏🏻💪🏻
She’s really done her homework! Appreciate the nuance she’s discussing, Scientology should be nervous indeed. Thanks.
So, the defense for defendant Danny “DJ Donkey Punch” Masterson introduces a letter which mentions several internal $cientology organisation documents?!? All of which serves to document the criminal organisation known as the “church” of $cientology interfering with a case that should have been prosecuted?
Bravo.
And well done, the judge, for keeping the frame of reference correct. This case ought to be about not only the multiple violent rapes but also about how much the organisation knew, when, and what it did about it...
"Balancing out the potential harm of the defendant against the justification for the delay, the court finds, as in Bracamontes, that the strong public interest in prosecution outweighs any potential for prejudice as I’ve already outlined.
For all of those reasons, the defense motion to dismiss Count One for pre-accusation delay is denied."
Yes, the public does have strong interest in this prosecution. And Masterson's $cieno helpers and the Clampire itself is on trial too. Now, where are those KRs and is there a way to get them for the criminal and civil trials? I wonder what Schaffer said in her KR and what other internal $cieno documents there are?
“But there is a different dynamic that goes on when you interview witnesses as it relates to the statements they give and sometimes the changing nature of those statements based upon their fear, fear of repercussion, fear of individuals, fear of organizations. And so this court doesn’t take the view that, because someone made one statement, that must necessarily be true at that time or that the statement that’s first given to the police might necessarily be true at the time. It’s this court’s experience, for having done — most of the crimes I have tried in the last ten years have been organizational crimes.”
This is outstanding! She understands and won’t be taking attacks by Masterson lightly.
Thank you for making my day! I am on holiday and a delicious coffee and this great news has tickled me. A judge that has done her research makes the October trial something to look forward to in the hopes she puts them back in their box 🤣👏🏻👏🏻💪🏻