10 Comments

Scientology is not going to give her a list of “reasonable” names to select from? That would be the most logical, yet judge seems too weak to rule that. Valerie must gamble & ask someone from the “hundreds” that she knows, hoping the person she selects is “in good standing.” 🙄

Expand full comment

To arbitrate with an arbitrator. Is like a rape of a victim having to see her assaulter. It makes no sense. Religious arbitration should be abolished. Why does the victim get treated like shit. Why does an accused rapist have more rights than victims.

Expand full comment

Like I said, letting this go to the church of scientology's arbitration is as good as tossing the lawsuit. This is far from "Justice."

Expand full comment

Ugh don’t like this judge. She doesn’t understand that Valerie has no clue who is in good standing by now. They say she knows hundreds of scientologists. Hmmmm are any of them UTR? Perhaps she can name one of them.

Expand full comment

I'm wondering why there isn't some mention to the judge in here by her attorney that no matter who is in "good standing" in Scientology will automatically be somebody not allowed to talk to her anyway, being that she's SP. Isn't that right? Shouldn't that have been the explanation as to why they need a list from Scientology? What a fucking joke.

Expand full comment

This travesty of justice begs the question: " what the fuck????"

The elephant in the room: Valerie being obligated to participate in an arbitration that applies to "members of the religion". Don't even get me started on the absurdity of a criminally negligent and fraudulent "religion" having a so-called arbitration process in the first place...

This whole thing just stinks. There is NO SUCH THING as "arbitration", per its legal definition, in scientology. There never was and there never will be.

The "most ethical group" on the planet, eh?

Expand full comment