6 Comments
User's avatar
KelS's avatar

How do you not use scientology lingo when it's engrained in the person and was their life?

Expand full comment
Linda Olsen's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Slacker's avatar

I hope the prosecution listens to this.

Thank you Chris.

Yes, I hope we need to define a few more.

I find it hard to believe that DM thought 'not going to law' was not in the Ethics book. What a huge 👏 mistake that will forever be but I can't see DM stating what all scientologists know?

Expand full comment
Slacker's avatar

Loose lips sink ships. How many times did I hear and or think that - SO 77-97

400?

Expand full comment
Tory Christman's avatar

Today it is stated:

"You need to clarify these are her beliefs only.

It's irrelevant what Scientology policies are"

Irrelevant? We would not be discussing this, without the Scientology policies. Also, there are no "beliefs" in Scientology. There is tech,

Policies and if you cannot follow them, either "qual" (to get you back on track) or Ethics, to "fix/repair" you.

If those don't work? You are declared SP and

That is what "no fraternizing with the enemy"

Has to do with. I was public and talked with many non-scientologists ("w*g")...no problemo. I knew IF I ever spoke to an SP, that would be considered "fraternizing with the enemy". Tricky...for many reasons.

Expand full comment
Gina Ordonez's avatar

Thank you for the fact checking.

Expand full comment