It was a startling allegation that we wrote about on December 2: In Leah Remini’s answer to Scientology’s attempt to strike much of her lawsuit, she cited a court transcript with stunning allegations of witness tampering against longtime Scientology attorney Kendrick Moxon.
One thing that stuck out in the Moxon brief. His use of a broad statement that he cannot substantiate.
“Many other persons have been inflamed by the allegations in the show and committed or threatened acts of violence arising out of it”. Then as Tony points out Moxon lies about a murder.
I remember when it was Bowles & Moxon. As I recall they were no longer a partnership when Moxon was asked to defend the Buenaventura Mission in the Raul Lopez case, but I think he had already been retained to defend Robert Cefail (one of the many other Scientologists who were defendants). I’m not sure if the church’s defense attorney was Tim Bowles, but I do recall he was an option. I routed off staff before the trial started. The church settled out of court.
I don’t think Tim Bowles is SO, his wife is ED at Pasadena and I’ve been to their house to pick up my daughter (she was house sitting). BTW, that was the last time I would see my daughter in June 2016.
I recall a series of videos Chris Shelton did with a woman who assisted Rick Moxon. I think she was under the impression he was in the SO.
Mike Rinder has also said that Moxon has an office at the HGB on Hollywood Blvd. How is it legal for a non profit to provide an office for a paid attorney? That’s a real question, if anyone knows.
One thing that stuck out in the Moxon brief. His use of a broad statement that he cannot substantiate.
“Many other persons have been inflamed by the allegations in the show and committed or threatened acts of violence arising out of it”. Then as Tony points out Moxon lies about a murder.
Moxon discredits himself by generalizing.
Scientologists lie. They are programmed to do so.
“Not a member of the SO.” Except SCN is his only client? He was a member of the GO, how could he not be SO?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moxon_%26_Kobrin
I remember when it was Bowles & Moxon. As I recall they were no longer a partnership when Moxon was asked to defend the Buenaventura Mission in the Raul Lopez case, but I think he had already been retained to defend Robert Cefail (one of the many other Scientologists who were defendants). I’m not sure if the church’s defense attorney was Tim Bowles, but I do recall he was an option. I routed off staff before the trial started. The church settled out of court.
I don’t think Tim Bowles is SO, his wife is ED at Pasadena and I’ve been to their house to pick up my daughter (she was house sitting). BTW, that was the last time I would see my daughter in June 2016.
I recall a series of videos Chris Shelton did with a woman who assisted Rick Moxon. I think she was under the impression he was in the SO.
Mike Rinder has also said that Moxon has an office at the HGB on Hollywood Blvd. How is it legal for a non profit to provide an office for a paid attorney? That’s a real question, if anyone knows.
Tim Bowles, is a consistent donor to the cherch. He is an a specialized field of employer, employee litigation.
I looked it up and he was one of the lawyers on the Lopez case.