6 Comments

My only thought is illegal church doctrine doesn’t supersede the law, unless you live in Alabama...:)

Expand full comment

...or Mississippi !😎

Expand full comment

My first thought as well.

Expand full comment

Bollocks and more bollocks. $cieno 'arbitration' was nixed and now defendants want to reinstate that. Time wasting seems to be a $cieno sacrament again.

The use of 'fair game' is at the heart of the harassment and no wide awake judge is going to drop that evidence. As for 'cancelling' 'fair game', Lroon' own writing shows that it was not really 'cancelled'. There are many, many examples of 'fair game' that went on after the bullsh*t 'cancelling'. Using those examples in court is so easy to do that I suspect the defendants attorneys aren't even trying for a 'hail mary'.

I suspect that plaintiffs have enough evidence to tie the Co$ to the dirty tricks. I await with baited breath that evidence.

Expand full comment

Time and money wasting in courts to “ruin” critics is the whole purpose of any litigation practices in the Co$. It’s in their litigation playbook.

Expand full comment

Pretending to be above the rest of the taxpayers, forcing 'ecclesiastical' abuses to remain silent, is to laugh at the rights inherent to terrestrial civilization.

Petty, vile, generally undetectable and extremely profitable foul play is the lifeblood of this organization, because without it it would be extinct in 8 or 9 days; 12 being optimistic.

Expand full comment