"Question One Regarding Who Decides Duress and Fraud Defenses Should Not Be Certified"
The abuser wants to be the one to decide who was and is the abuser. That is all of what this argument is about. Citing the Garcia case is like throwing an apple into a box of oranges. The Garcia case was all about fraud and contracts that the Garcias signed while not under duress. The duress that the Freewind's slaves endured does not at all compare to the Garcia situation.
As for $cieno 'arbitration', in human trafficking cases it does not apply. Your abuser does not get to decide what is the proper remedy for their crimes. And crime it is.
Forced labor is the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery. (22 U.S.C. § 7102(11)(B)).
Unfortunately the court most likely does not read Hubbards policy’s on how to destroy the enemies of Scientology. If they did they would know the cherch lawyers are lying through their teeth. The idea of Scientology justice is an oxymoron. They are beyond criminal.
Do the plaintiffs get to file a response to the lies by Scn in their “this is outrageous” filing before the 11th circuit takes these briefs as factual?
"Question One Regarding Who Decides Duress and Fraud Defenses Should Not Be Certified"
The abuser wants to be the one to decide who was and is the abuser. That is all of what this argument is about. Citing the Garcia case is like throwing an apple into a box of oranges. The Garcia case was all about fraud and contracts that the Garcias signed while not under duress. The duress that the Freewind's slaves endured does not at all compare to the Garcia situation.
As for $cieno 'arbitration', in human trafficking cases it does not apply. Your abuser does not get to decide what is the proper remedy for their crimes. And crime it is.
Forced labor is the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery. (22 U.S.C. § 7102(11)(B)).
Unfortunately the court most likely does not read Hubbards policy’s on how to destroy the enemies of Scientology. If they did they would know the cherch lawyers are lying through their teeth. The idea of Scientology justice is an oxymoron. They are beyond criminal.
Wish the plaintiffs lawyers had included that in their brief and forced the justices to consider it
Yes. Part of going up against cult is voluminous amount Hubbard strict policy’s that need to be studied.
Do the plaintiffs get to file a response to the lies by Scn in their “this is outrageous” filing before the 11th circuit takes these briefs as factual?