Yesterday, Priscilla Presley answered the newest version of Brigitte Kruse’s Orlando breach of contract lawsuit with a motion to dismiss the suit, and once again argued that she has virtually no real connection to the state of Florida and should not be subject to the court’s jurisdiction.
The appellate lawyers are bound by the courts previous injunctions. The End. They can go through the court and get access to the jurors, but they can't do that on their own. As for the 'easily identifiable identity', I call bovine excrement on that lie. The court should smack down hard on that lie.
As for the Presleys, I wonder when the tabloids will be jumping on that? The contract was signed in Florida, so why the bother? Maybe a federal court should have been used? Delay and obfuscate are not just $cientology sacraments.
Some confusion here: Why would the jurors complain to the court about contact and yet, according to Holley's statement, openly talk to her? Something doesn't smell right. Besides that, I'd like to know what could possibly be discussed so the appeal has a different outcome.
The appellate lawyers are bound by the courts previous injunctions. The End. They can go through the court and get access to the jurors, but they can't do that on their own. As for the 'easily identifiable identity', I call bovine excrement on that lie. The court should smack down hard on that lie.
As for the Presleys, I wonder when the tabloids will be jumping on that? The contract was signed in Florida, so why the bother? Maybe a federal court should have been used? Delay and obfuscate are not just $cientology sacraments.
Some confusion here: Why would the jurors complain to the court about contact and yet, according to Holley's statement, openly talk to her? Something doesn't smell right. Besides that, I'd like to know what could possibly be discussed so the appeal has a different outcome.