Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Techie's avatar

Several points that are very bizarre:

All Committees of Evidence proceedings are recorded. In mine they had a little cassette recorder. After each meeting the Secretary would type up a transcript. The Interested Party (defendant) would not get a copy, but one would be made.

They are proving the point of the lawsuit by continuing to harass her. How do they think this will look when it goes back to the judge?

In a real arbitration the idea is to come to some agreement about a grievance or complaint and adjudicate for or against the complainant. Whatever this is, it cannot result in anything resembling justice. I can't even see the point of it, other than completely cowing Valerie into submission.

Maybe that's what they are hoping for, but it isn't likely. Stand strong Valerie! Illegitimatum non carborundum est! (As we used to say in the 60s, "Don't let the bastards grind you down" in faked-up Latin).

Jens TINGLEFF's avatar

This sounds like a determined attempt to grind the ex-victim into the dust mentally.

Stay strong Valerie. It sucks that the courts in the US are so hoodwinked as to allow the criminal organisation known a the "church" of $cientology to perform this act of attempted domination.

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?