13 Comments
founding

perfect response by Ms. Haney

Expand full comment

"I'd blow a horse" to get out of this...

Expand full comment

Great suggestions from Graham and Valerie!

Expand full comment

Absolutely love this! Catherine Bell was my first thought, kudos, Valerie

Expand full comment

Ah, Valerie and Graham have driven Little Lord Pimpslap into fits of Macallan-fueled rage...

I WISH scientology "scripture" (i.e. policy letters, books,etc.) would be added as footnotes in these motions to really emphasize how disingenuous their legal arguments are...

Expand full comment

There is a Steve Martin gag where he says that if you create a hostage situation one of your demands should be to remove the letter M from the English language, so that you can use the insanity plea if you get arrested. It could be that everyone but Emily Jones is a letter M.

Expand full comment

Brilliant.

Expand full comment

😬😬😬

Expand full comment

So if Ms. Haney talks with a Scientologist in good standing to ask them to participate in the arbitration, they are no longer a Scientologist in good standing because they have talked with her.

I wish she could talk with all Scientologists. There would be no one left to dole out lower conditions or whatever.

Expand full comment

Love it. But I'm still unsure why the court is letting this arbitration to proceed as is. The process seems to me to violate so many limitations in California related to employment arbitrations.

Expand full comment

These are religious arbitrations, not employment, and the legal system is exceedingly reluctant to intervene in religious matters. It's so frustrating.

Expand full comment