Is John Goodwin now among the walking dead? Yeah, let's push that narrative and see how long Goodwin stays at ASI. At ASI, he and his wife have pushed the sales of Lroon's fiction and are used to talking to the public. After all, what is $cientology but a sales oriented company? Well, it used to be sales oriented, now it is some sort or trophy based 'philanthropist' coven.
You comment about the crazy lady, demonstrates the kind of quality journalist you are. Good job. Defending and promoting the truth, wherever that leads, is what we need a lot more of these days. Thank you for that Tony.
I don't think John has the strong nasty streak enough to be future leader, NOT unless Scientology somehow turns over a new leaf and intentionally puts a decent person in the leadership roles in the top two councils. (I met John several times, he's honestly too nice of a person to be like Miscavige, it's just not in him, and good for him.)
THere isn't any LRH orders to have a David Miscavige style leader.
The ASI traffic, which contains about 20-25 "COB ASI" despatches, none of them say for Misavige to be the leader of the movement.
LRH wished and wrote the roles for the leadership units of the movment to be spread around, and the Command Channels booklet has NOTHING to say for the role that Miscavige has taken as the COB RTC role.
No, this is a false almost only an outsider type of false choice question,
If Scientology is Hubbard's baby, then outsiders have to do their homework, read the Command Channels booklet, that's the LRH intended leadership spread for the movement.
The ASI traffic gave Miscavige only approval authority on some of the top positions, for instance the ASI advices gave Miscavige the duty where to place the AVC job. But Miscavige incorrectly retained the top approval job when he was supposed to relinquish I/A (issue authority) to AVC.
I witnessed, firsthand, I proofread the ASI advices, what I said above is the way it ought to go, if top people coming after Miscavige go back to what Hubbard wrote, and do what LRH said, that's what they will do.
They will review ALL of LRH's final writings, the raw manuscripts, tapes, despatches, and string it all out, and do what LRH said.
He never said never gave Miscavige the top boss role. That's not was LRH wrote.
So, it's a false question to ask who is going to replace Miscavige.
It's a more in depth issue, and it means you have to read all of what LRH finally wrote, going back about 5-8 years, in a row, and review it all carefully.
Is John Goodwin now among the walking dead? Yeah, let's push that narrative and see how long Goodwin stays at ASI. At ASI, he and his wife have pushed the sales of Lroon's fiction and are used to talking to the public. After all, what is $cientology but a sales oriented company? Well, it used to be sales oriented, now it is some sort or trophy based 'philanthropist' coven.
You comment about the crazy lady, demonstrates the kind of quality journalist you are. Good job. Defending and promoting the truth, wherever that leads, is what we need a lot more of these days. Thank you for that Tony.
I don't think John has the strong nasty streak enough to be future leader, NOT unless Scientology somehow turns over a new leaf and intentionally puts a decent person in the leadership roles in the top two councils. (I met John several times, he's honestly too nice of a person to be like Miscavige, it's just not in him, and good for him.)
THere isn't any LRH orders to have a David Miscavige style leader.
The ASI traffic, which contains about 20-25 "COB ASI" despatches, none of them say for Misavige to be the leader of the movement.
LRH wished and wrote the roles for the leadership units of the movment to be spread around, and the Command Channels booklet has NOTHING to say for the role that Miscavige has taken as the COB RTC role.
No, this is a false almost only an outsider type of false choice question,
If Scientology is Hubbard's baby, then outsiders have to do their homework, read the Command Channels booklet, that's the LRH intended leadership spread for the movement.
The ASI traffic gave Miscavige only approval authority on some of the top positions, for instance the ASI advices gave Miscavige the duty where to place the AVC job. But Miscavige incorrectly retained the top approval job when he was supposed to relinquish I/A (issue authority) to AVC.
I witnessed, firsthand, I proofread the ASI advices, what I said above is the way it ought to go, if top people coming after Miscavige go back to what Hubbard wrote, and do what LRH said, that's what they will do.
They will review ALL of LRH's final writings, the raw manuscripts, tapes, despatches, and string it all out, and do what LRH said.
He never said never gave Miscavige the top boss role. That's not was LRH wrote.
So, it's a false question to ask who is going to replace Miscavige.
It's a more in depth issue, and it means you have to read all of what LRH finally wrote, going back about 5-8 years, in a row, and review it all carefully.
This is true, LOL.
Chuck Beatty
xTeamXenu75to03
PS: Janis Grady ought be asked the same question.