Once a rich dupe is hooked, Scientology/Hubbard has 'em for a while.
Thanks to L. Ron's full maze of regulations and requirements, and hoops, and self praise brainwashing false claims of saving the world, and all the various things richer folks are able to put off, like their consciences which they lost once they put their faith in Hubbar…
Once a rich dupe is hooked, Scientology/Hubbard has 'em for a while.
Thanks to L. Ron's full maze of regulations and requirements, and hoops, and self praise brainwashing false claims of saving the world, and all the various things richer folks are able to put off, like their consciences which they lost once they put their faith in Hubbard, taking Hubbard's false claims of Scientology's worthwhileness to humanity's solving earth's problems, with the Hubbard pattting the dupes on the heads with bowling trophies, etc.
Hubbard's pat the rich dupes on the head successful actions, the IAS always gives the big donors all sorts of goodies too, baskets of nick nacks, I saw my boss's IAS delivered basket of goodies once, it was tawdry Christmas season basket type of stuff.
The bigger the cheeze donors, I'm sure their "thankyou" baskets are of a whole different order from IAS for the big donations.
The rich Scientologists fit the lottery winning role Hubbard outlined of the "big beings" of earth, they make the big money contributions, they are putting the Ideal Orgs buildings there for humanity.
If not for the increased wealth in the world, and if not for rich Scientology "hard selling" IAS regges doing their semi "crim regging", and then the guilting ala Hubbard's "Hard Sell" salesmanship policies.
There used to be a "Hard Sell" whole binder that was extant back in the 1980s, with all of the LRH references for "hard selling" "crim regges" to use to guilt the dupes into paying up.
If money increasingly available to spend,
Then dupes with extra money to burn.
Con operations seek out those dupes, rake in the richer dupes' money.
Con continues, at least in outward appearance, meaning buildings as show cases, and self praising in house media/videoing of meager successes of the con.
I wonder what the real "top" opinion leaders who don't speak up, I wonder what people like Greta Van Susteren thinks about the Hubbard scam, and if she's ever given it much thought.
It'd be great is she'd read "Going Clear...." and read all the other critical books, and agree to a sitdown long interview with Tony, and ask her some pointed questions if she really thinks what Hubbard's goals are and how they aren't being achieved. Greta surely cannot think Scientology is making a dent in fixing earth.
I wonder where she is on the Hubbard stepladder of quackery, and who gave her her auditing/exorcism.
Once a rich dupe is hooked, Scientology/Hubbard has 'em for a while.
Thanks to L. Ron's full maze of regulations and requirements, and hoops, and self praise brainwashing false claims of saving the world, and all the various things richer folks are able to put off, like their consciences which they lost once they put their faith in Hubbard, taking Hubbard's false claims of Scientology's worthwhileness to humanity's solving earth's problems, with the Hubbard pattting the dupes on the heads with bowling trophies, etc.
Hubbard's pat the rich dupes on the head successful actions, the IAS always gives the big donors all sorts of goodies too, baskets of nick nacks, I saw my boss's IAS delivered basket of goodies once, it was tawdry Christmas season basket type of stuff.
The bigger the cheeze donors, I'm sure their "thankyou" baskets are of a whole different order from IAS for the big donations.
The rich Scientologists fit the lottery winning role Hubbard outlined of the "big beings" of earth, they make the big money contributions, they are putting the Ideal Orgs buildings there for humanity.
If not for the increased wealth in the world, and if not for rich Scientology "hard selling" IAS regges doing their semi "crim regging", and then the guilting ala Hubbard's "Hard Sell" salesmanship policies.
There used to be a "Hard Sell" whole binder that was extant back in the 1980s, with all of the LRH references for "hard selling" "crim regges" to use to guilt the dupes into paying up.
If money increasingly available to spend,
Then dupes with extra money to burn.
Con operations seek out those dupes, rake in the richer dupes' money.
Con continues, at least in outward appearance, meaning buildings as show cases, and self praising in house media/videoing of meager successes of the con.
I wonder what the real "top" opinion leaders who don't speak up, I wonder what people like Greta Van Susteren thinks about the Hubbard scam, and if she's ever given it much thought.
It'd be great is she'd read "Going Clear...." and read all the other critical books, and agree to a sitdown long interview with Tony, and ask her some pointed questions if she really thinks what Hubbard's goals are and how they aren't being achieved. Greta surely cannot think Scientology is making a dent in fixing earth.
I wonder where she is on the Hubbard stepladder of quackery, and who gave her her auditing/exorcism.