This morning we described to you some of the issues that Danny Masterson’s defense attorney Philip Cohen planned to raise in today’s hearing ahead of Masterson’s retrial, which is scheduled for April 11. Now we’ve heard from multiple people who attended this morning’s hearing, and for the first time Leah Remini made an appearance in Judge Charlaine Olmedo’s courtroom on the Masterson matter.
Scientology is a key component in this case. Scientology "religious scripture" dictates non-reporting of crimes and security checks for victims of crimes("what did you do in this and/or some other life to 'pull in' the attack?"). Scientology "religious scripture" labels reporting crimes...a crime! And further stipulates that those who do so can be harassed and "ruined utterly".
Damn, there HAS TO BE A WAY, legally, to get the scientology "religious scripture" that is a major cause of the absolute fuckery that has occurred in this case into the trial record, yes?
Shout out to Leah for continuing to put her polished Louboutins in The Pimping Homunculus' sorry ass!
Hi Mr. Ortega! First of all, THANK YOU for all you do. It's a lot of work doing all this research and writing and your hard work does not go unnoticed. I would like to know, if possible, how I could attend the Masterson trail. I live in Orange County and would love to attend a day or two - is it possible for the public to attend? Should I be asking someone else? If so, please let me know. Again, love your passion, you are the best!! Seriously!!! Cathy
Thanks for the quick response! And, thanks for letting me know. I just may give it a try. Are they against spit wads shot at Danny in the courtroom! :)
Claire is exactly what the court needs. Someone who is able to make it clear that the policies of the organization are exactly what the victims have said that they are. I know that there were precedents set in the trials involving the Mormon church but not sure what they were and wondering if they would apply in this case.
Claire is exactly what the court needs. Someone who is able to make it clear that the policies of the organization are exactly what the victims have said that they are. I know that there were precedents set in the trials involving the Mormon church but not sure what they were and wondering if they would apply in this case.
Leah's the best friend we all need :)
Scientology is a key component in this case. Scientology "religious scripture" dictates non-reporting of crimes and security checks for victims of crimes("what did you do in this and/or some other life to 'pull in' the attack?"). Scientology "religious scripture" labels reporting crimes...a crime! And further stipulates that those who do so can be harassed and "ruined utterly".
Damn, there HAS TO BE A WAY, legally, to get the scientology "religious scripture" that is a major cause of the absolute fuckery that has occurred in this case into the trial record, yes?
Shout out to Leah for continuing to put her polished Louboutins in The Pimping Homunculus' sorry ass!
Edited for spelling🤓
Hi Mr. Ortega! First of all, THANK YOU for all you do. It's a lot of work doing all this research and writing and your hard work does not go unnoticed. I would like to know, if possible, how I could attend the Masterson trail. I live in Orange County and would love to attend a day or two - is it possible for the public to attend? Should I be asking someone else? If so, please let me know. Again, love your passion, you are the best!! Seriously!!! Cathy
Thanks for the quick response! And, thanks for letting me know. I just may give it a try. Are they against spit wads shot at Danny in the courtroom! :)
Good luck to the accusers and to the prosecution.
Claire is exactly what the court needs. Someone who is able to make it clear that the policies of the organization are exactly what the victims have said that they are. I know that there were precedents set in the trials involving the Mormon church but not sure what they were and wondering if they would apply in this case.
Claire is exactly what the court needs. Someone who is able to make it clear that the policies of the organization are exactly what the victims have said that they are. I know that there were precedents set in the trials involving the Mormon church but not sure what they were and wondering if they would apply in this case.