Ahead of Tuesday’s hearing, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Randolph Hammock has issued a tentative ruling, granting some of Scientology’s motion to strike portions of Leah Remini’s lawsuit, and sustaining other parts of the lawsuit.
From the Willersheim case quote:The record reflects the fact that the Church is a matter of public interest, as evidenced by media coverage and the extent of the Church's membership and assets. Furthermore, the underlying action concerned a fundamental right, the constitutional protection under the First Amendment religious practices guaranties, and addressed the scope of such protection, concluding that the public has a compelling secular interest in discouraging certain conduct even though it qualifies as a religious expression of the Scientology religion.
-- Holy Hubbard that is amazing.
Second, from this judge directly: It goes without saying that courts need not issue declarations simply telling parties to obey the law.
-- Oh ignorance is bliss. Not that it would matter as CoS would just ignore any declaration they didn't like. But, the reason would be to have an official, formal, legal declaration that Scientology SHOULD follow the law.
It is sad to observe how the administration of legal laws, to seek to do justice, are far from the generic concept "justice", when they do not coincide precisely, in certain malicious and pernicious actions, deliberately not legally objective.
Dear unregistered readers. I am also a simple reader. If you read the articles that Toni Ortega contributes here, it is because you are sensitive to the consequences of all kinds that reach us, from people who had to do with Scientology. Mark Plummer was one of those very special people, for having the big heart and courage to inform the public as a former Scientologist, to ensure that people know, and are more independent and fortunate in their lives, thus assuming the policy of that organization, against those who denounce after leaving, converted to 'SP' and what this implies in their lives as an objective to harm, of those who still believe in that social group.
This man deserves to have a dignified funeral, simply, but the situation that the family faced makes them have to go through a double inconvenience, being forced to have to receive donations for the funeral of the admirable and dear man, by all those who had the opportunity. honor and pleasure of knowing this great man: Mark Plummer.
Most of us have a fair economy to live on, but believe it or not, even 1 dollar can mean a lot; more than you think, and it is totally anonymous.. “A barn is many small grains”.. and life takes many turns..
After capturing it, through the link you will be able to see what has been donated so far, and what is necessary for the important day of final farewell to their family and friends.
From the Willersheim case quote:The record reflects the fact that the Church is a matter of public interest, as evidenced by media coverage and the extent of the Church's membership and assets. Furthermore, the underlying action concerned a fundamental right, the constitutional protection under the First Amendment religious practices guaranties, and addressed the scope of such protection, concluding that the public has a compelling secular interest in discouraging certain conduct even though it qualifies as a religious expression of the Scientology religion.
-- Holy Hubbard that is amazing.
Second, from this judge directly: It goes without saying that courts need not issue declarations simply telling parties to obey the law.
-- Oh ignorance is bliss. Not that it would matter as CoS would just ignore any declaration they didn't like. But, the reason would be to have an official, formal, legal declaration that Scientology SHOULD follow the law.
To the criminal organisation known as the "church" of $cientology, drowning a judge's dog would qualify as "pre-litigation research."
Congrats to Leah's legal team.
It is sad to observe how the administration of legal laws, to seek to do justice, are far from the generic concept "justice", when they do not coincide precisely, in certain malicious and pernicious actions, deliberately not legally objective.
Dear unregistered readers. I am also a simple reader. If you read the articles that Toni Ortega contributes here, it is because you are sensitive to the consequences of all kinds that reach us, from people who had to do with Scientology. Mark Plummer was one of those very special people, for having the big heart and courage to inform the public as a former Scientologist, to ensure that people know, and are more independent and fortunate in their lives, thus assuming the policy of that organization, against those who denounce after leaving, converted to 'SP' and what this implies in their lives as an objective to harm, of those who still believe in that social group.
This man deserves to have a dignified funeral, simply, but the situation that the family faced makes them have to go through a double inconvenience, being forced to have to receive donations for the funeral of the admirable and dear man, by all those who had the opportunity. honor and pleasure of knowing this great man: Mark Plummer.
Most of us have a fair economy to live on, but believe it or not, even 1 dollar can mean a lot; more than you think, and it is totally anonymous.. “A barn is many small grains”.. and life takes many turns..
After capturing it, through the link you will be able to see what has been donated so far, and what is necessary for the important day of final farewell to their family and friends.
Thank you very much in advance.
If you are so kind, share it.
https://substack.com/redirect/1f97fa3f-f707-4439-8c01-198dfcdbc961?j=eyJ1IjoiMm82M2wzIn0.UguqLbi4AeAiRxhY6MXFpyOxupM5w2mYVT2T61t1rTc